On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby <jononor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3 June 2012 23:11, Jacek Poplawski <jacekpoplawski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Øyvind Kolås <pippin@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Caching the LUTs sounds like an optimization that should go in directly, >>> though I doubt that is what is taking most of the time. >> >> >> Well my primary concern is - are gimp developers at all interested in any >> work on improving c2g. > The maintainer (of GEGL) has here expressed an interest in getting > this optimization in - that is a pretty strong yes. > > -- > Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com There is another thread here (somewhere) where I had posted numbers for c2g operations in gegl using a D800 sample jpeg. The optimization suggested by Øyvind lead to a substantial improvement in speed at least on Windows. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
