Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > I suggest you actually try GIMP 2.6 or even 2.4. Personally I don't > see a constructive discussion arising from assumptions that have > nothing to do with actual state of affairs. GIMP had been I'm not making assumptions, I'm stating the admitted (by the Gimp developers themselves) state of affairs. See <http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-open-save-export-p23991355.html> and <http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-open-save-export-p23995043.html> Graeme Gill. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
