On Saturday, May 12, 2012, 14:20:02, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote: > btw, new jpeg defaults are much, much better than 2.6s but imo the > progressive option shouldn't be on. It makes the file size a tad larger > and it isn't always needed. Is there any special reason for using that > option as default? In my experience, the majority of images become smaller when you save them as progressive. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > A computer makes as many mistakes in two seconds as 20 men working 20 years. -- Horowitz's Rule _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
