>>>>> "g" == gfxuser <gfx.user@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> With such a clarification, there shouldn't be any reason to use the >> code as the basis for a GIMP plugin or patch. g> Did I get you right? If the code wouldn't be used in GIMP, why then g> any clarification is needed? g> Could you please clarify this? ;-) If the code -- or a derivative thereof -- would not be used in GIMP, then why did the first reply suggest (needlessly) trying to get the code relicensed as GPL3? -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
