Re: Difference between GIMP_PLUGIN and GIMP_EXTENSION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 April 2012 15:12, Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 18:33 +0200, Alessandro Francesconi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> what's the conceptual difference between GIMP_PLUGIN and GIMP_EXTENSION
>> types?
>> When a "plugin" must be defined as an extension?
>
> Have you checked the developer docs of gimp_install_procedure()?
> It's all there.

Indeed...all:
"""
In the beginning, there was Wilber, Wilber the gimp. The graphic was
without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the desktop,
and the Spirit of Wilber was moving over the face of the bitstream.

And Wilber said, "<Toolbox>/File/New," and there was an image. And
Wilber saw that the image was good, and Wilber separated the image
into drawables. And Wilber looked down at what he had wrought, and
Wilber said, "Oh golly." For Wilber had made the drawables of the
layer according to their kinds, and the drawables of the channel
according to their kinds, and the drawables of the mask according to
their kinds …


"""

>
> Regards,
> --Mitch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux