On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Isaac Wagner <isaacbwagner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GIMP side or the GEGL side or somewhere in-between, that I am genuinely > enthusiastic to be a part of. I want to work on something that you actually > need. GIMP will in the 2.10 cycle depend a _lot_ more on GEGL, actually by the end of the cycle everything you normally do in GIMP should be powered by GEGL. Creating test cases, verifying that GEGL behaves correctly as well as developing new operations is easier with a standalone tool. GEGL used to have a GUI sandbox for such experiments that used a tree based representation with clones (see http://pippin.gimp.org/tmp/gegl-foo/ for some screen shots). Such a tool that permits more direct manipulation and testing of the concepts of GEGL (which is a processing graph of nodes) permits faster developer feedback as well as making it easier to construct test cases for verifying the behavior of GEGL - this is something that increases in importance as GEGL is adopted for the core parts of GIMP. /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ ; http://ffii.org/ _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
