Robert, >> I suggest we do the same as for the 2011 student work: >> <http://blog.mmiworks.net/2011/07/teaching-interaction-11.html> >> the work was taken further by my design team in a 3-day design sprint: >> <http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Warp_tool_specification> > The 2010's Voralberg's research is about combining four selection tools > (fuzzy select, select by color, intelligent scrissors and foreground selection). > The suggestion from Peter Sikking was to do as the 2011 student's have > done. This research is about iWarp tool. I've read also this research, and > also studied the work of the design team. No I suggested that the same procedure is followed, not the same project content. That means: if the SoC work goes forward on the combined four selection tools, my team does a design sprint, taking the design of the combined four selection tools forward. this would be a solid basis to for you to work from. --ps founder + principal interaction architect man + machine interface works http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
