Re: GIMP UI quality opinion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>
>>> We consider it crucial to satisfy the needs of advanced users in the
>>> first place. That involves studying their workflows (which we did in
>>> 2006 and then again in late 2011), working out strategies for further
>>> development, writing functional specs and, finally, writing the actual
>>> code. All of that is a huge amount of work, but we do it anyway.
>>
>> Looks like you trying to build a bulldozer forgetting than much more
>> people just need a good car.
>
> Designing interactions and interfaces is more than just throwing an
> occasional toolbar to UI and thinking your job ends there.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that you are against relying on strategies for
> designing consistent UIs, but we won't go for an amoeba as a common
> denominator, and the matter ends there.
>

I were not saying anything like that.That was invented with your
overloaded and overcomplicated mind.
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux