On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alexia Death wrote: > Cinepaint hasn't made releases in years (and two of the last releases > don't even have source code tarballs) despite of endless promises. The > only thing that is alive is Kai-Uwe's Git tree where occasional > development happens, again, without releases. > > Out of curiousity, what exactly would you like to merge from Cinepaint? :) Painter fork, not cinepaint ;) On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, phanisvara das <listmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > in general you're correct, of course. exceptions confirm the validity of > rules though, and with your development version of GIMP (git master), you > created one of those. i do have GIMP stable installed as well, apart from > pulling the latest git version on mondays, but, if i remember correctly, i > had to use that only once during those 2+ years. every other time GIMP 2.7 > miserably failed to crash on me, or misbehave in any other significant way. > it's more stable than other software i'm using that's already in their 4th > release. While gimp in its development form is quite stable compared, you have gotten lucky and have not strayed from beaten path too much;) Ive lost at least once about 4h worth of painting to a crash ;) Crashes itself are not that big of an issue tho, they are easy to find and fix. There are more subtle ways a developer version can misbehave ruining your art. Crashes are easy to catch, unintended behavior in some cases can not. -- --Alexia _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list