On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can > see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax > where 1 + 1 is written "1 + 1" and not "(+ 1 1)". If we want to have a > main scripting language that as many as possible can use with as > little effort as possible, Scheme is simply not an alternative. For > most programmers, Scheme is an odd language. In the long term I think > it is inevitable that we need to replace Scheme with something that > has a syntax that is more mainstream. I wholeheartedly agree with that. > However, doing the switch is a huge task and we have other things that > are more important to work on, so I don't see this happening any time > soon. Haven't we got a quite nice Python interface already? _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
