Lemme guess. That aging build from Ubuntu PPA that said "2.7.3" even
when GIMP was 2.7.1 in Git? :)
hahaha, exactly! LOL
There is lot of confusion regarding this, which is why I think we
should start with GEGL-like version numbering, i.e. odd micro numbers
for code in git, even micro numbers for releases.
Indeed, quite confusing ^^
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Thales Oliveira - WeAreLinux.com wrote:Lemme guess. That aging build from Ubuntu PPA that said "2.7.3" even
> I'm sorry, hasn't it been available for a while? At least I have been using
> 2.7.3 for months. Great news anyway.
when GIMP was 2.7.1 in Git? :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Thales�Oliveira -�www.ThalesOliveira.com
� � �+55�31�8365 3869
� � �+55�31�3309 8760
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
