Re: Gimp should be GIMP, but have no idea about GimpCageConfig (translation related)

[Michael Muré <batolettre@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm afraid I don't have a better answer than "pippin told me this".

If nobody object in the next few days, I will unmark them for translation.

2011/8/2 Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx>

2011/8/2 Michael Muré <batolettre@xxxxxxxxx>:

>> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
>> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
>> msgid "A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation"
>
> For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future,
> when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation.

Hi Michael,

I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of
GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this?

Best regards,
Martin


--

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
"GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com"

--

Michael

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer