On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 17:58 -0400, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > Hi, > > If we run this tiny fu expression on gimp 2.6 > (gimp-procedural-db-proc-arg "gimp-layer-get-name" 0), we get: > (16 "drawable" "The drawable") > > on gimp master, we are getting (0 "item" "The item") - actually, we > are getting "0" back for any parameter > derived of gimp-item. This completly breaks PDB parameter > introspection. Languuage bindings - including > the python bindings depend on this to correctly return the correct > GIMP_PDB_* constant to work. > (scheme works because it treats all GIMP objects as an integer (by > their IDs) and has no type checking) > > > Can someone find-out what broke this? Maybe it is a use case for the > famous "git bisect" thing - but I don't > have a setup to try that. Maybe it's a use case for simply looking at the code that returns the wrong value :) Fixed in master. --mitch _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
