On 18/09/2010 19:23, Sven Neumann wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 01:51 +0200, Ofnuts wrote: > >> >> I had overlooked the fact that greyscale was an attribute of the image >> and not the layer. Thanks for the reminder. With that in mind I could >> perform some more tests with greyscale and it turns out that at least >> the python interface returns 3 or 4 channels even in greyscale, so >> everything is OK. > > If that is the case, then there is a bug somewhere. But I very much > doubt that gray-scale layers are reported to have 3 or channels. Perhaps > you can show us some example code? > Hmm. Wrote some fresh code to demonstrate this and of course it behaves as you say. Grumble, grumble. Back to the drawing board. Thx for the heads up. PS: well, something fishy still. Creating a greyscale layer in a RGB image works, and yields a 1BPP layer: image_color = pdb.gimp_image_new(100,100,0) layer_grayscale=pdb.gimp_layer_new(image_color,100,100,2,'grayscale_layer',100,0) print pdb.gimp_drawable_get_pixel(layer_grayscale,0,0) This a moot point right now because I'm not creating images & layers that way, but you said this couldn't happen? _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
