Re: Optimized Despeckle plug-in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




To maximize chances of getting this into GIMP:

1. Create a regression test for the despecle plug-in that is run
   with 'make check'. This is a great way to convince us that
   your optimization in fact does not change the output, only
   improves performance.
2. Create a patch, following the instructions here:
   http://www.gimp.org/bugs/howtos/submit-patch.html

Since your change is significant, feel free to add yourself to the
copyright header.

Regards,
Martin

 
Sorry for such a delay but my full time job absorbed me lately more than I would like to :-)

1) Unfortunatelly due to the nature of the filter it will not pass simple golden image tests against the non-optimized version. Filter sorts pixels based on their luma and takes a pixel that falls into median luma bucket. Since there can be several pixels that fall into the same luma bucket, the resulting pixel
might differ.

2) I've submitted a patch to Bugzilla https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628817

Przemek
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux