Re: comparison of enlargements produced with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In light of some feedback received, me and my students will be making
major changes to three of the gegl methods, so you may want to wait
until the comparisons are updated.

Nicolas Robidoux

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Nicolas Robidoux
<nicolas.robidoux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To illustrate the effect of the samplers when ROTATING images, I put
> together a comparative test. It shows the results of rotating a quite
> sharp image of astronauts near the space station---if I remember
> correctly---by 6.5 degrees with four GIMP methods, three GEGL methods
> and three candidate GEGL methods for which patches are provided in
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619314
>
> (The image is very sharp: I actually wonder if NASA sharpened it.)
>
> The results, named one.png to nin.png, are found in the tar archive
>
> http://web.cs.laurentian.ca/nrobidoux/misc/astronautsrotatetests.tgz
>
> To know which method was used to produce each image (and get runtimes
> for the GEGL methods), read the KEY text file.
>
> Nicolas Robidoux
>
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux