On Tue, 25 May 2010 20:06:48 -0500 Dieki N <dieki.ubuntu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Dieki N <dieki.ubuntu@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > I've created a patch to improve the behavior of brush size > > increase\decrease keyboard shortcuts, particularly at small sizes > > and large sizes. The old behavior increased\decreased the brush > > size by a fixed value (0.10), which worked fine at medium sizes, > > and reasonably well at large sizes (since you could hold down the > > keyboard shortcut to get a lot of change), but completely broke > > down at sizes underneath 0.20, since you tended to have two > > options; too big or too small. (Or, when under 0.10, none at all!) > > > > This patch sets the increment according to the following rules: > > > > If <brush size> is greater than 2, it increments by 0.20. > > If <brush size> is less than 2 but greater than 0.50, it increments > > by 0.10. > > If <brush size> is less than 0.50 but greater than 0.10, it > > increments by 0.05. > > If <brush size> is less than 0.10, it increments by 0.01. > > > > I've tested this in my own use over the last couple weeks, and it > > seems most helpful, particularly when masking fine details. This > > patch is against Master. Well I tried that patch and like it. I also thought that the scaling was too aggressive and that patch seems to settle it down nicely. Thanks Owen _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
