Another question: could developing a stand alone but gegl-based application be a GSoC project?
Thanks,
Jenny
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/27/2010 12:26 PM, Jenny wrote:IMHO, GEGL should only be a great image processing library, not an image
> GEGL shipped an GUI application for test, with which user takes many OPs
> on the default image. But this application can not load images.
>
> I want to write a user-friendly GUI for GEGL as my GSoC project. I think
> this application should provide many drag-able "block"s, where each
> block assigns an operation. User drags blocks and connects them to
> process image. Kinda like the simulink
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulink).
>
> Expecting feedback.
processing library + an advanced UI tool. Also being the latter adds
considerable maintenance and development burdens, making it harder to
focus on the core functionality. It'd be fine to create an external
project that has a GEGL dependency though, of course.
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
"GIMP 2.8 development still under control"
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
