Joseph Miller wrote: > I have to work with a lot of website images so I end up doing a lot of > resizing. I kept running into problems though where I would resize a > whole set of layers, then find out I made them to large or too small. > But I wouldn't be able to know this until I had them laid out on the > image and could visually see the result. Since git Gimp has support for > layer trees now (woo!) I figured this would be the easiest way to > implement the feature. I just got this arranged about 20 minutes ago so > I have not done a whole lot of testing. I also don't really know much > about Gimp internals. I am looking for comments to my approach. Should > I be moving in a different direction? I would like to add > brightness-contrast non-destructive editing next, then maybe some color > correction. Hi Joseph! Interesting patch, but it is unfortunately in the wrong direction. Non-destructive scaling needs to be implemented with GEGL and not by hijacking layer group semantics. Also, you should submit patches with git format-patch as described here: http://gimp.org/bugs/howtos/submit-patch.html But anyway, it's great to see a fresh mind hack on GIMP, keep those patches coming! Best regards, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Reducing UI clutter, docking bars removed" _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer