Hi, On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 11:41 -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > So, two main questions here: first, what is the working philosophy > around here about code comments? Are we preferring more of a "well > written code should explain itself" approach? Exactly. But comments are of course welcome. > Are we inclined to accept > patch submissions that simply add comments to code? Are there guidelines > for what code comments should be like? Of course patches that add comments are appreciated and we have accepted such patches in the past. Comments should be in gtk-doc syntax, so that they end up in the API reference manual. > Second, if new developers can't figure out what a piece of code does, or > where some functionality is, should we ask on this list? (That's > actually not a hypothetical question in my case...) Sure. This is the right place to ask. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
