On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 03:53 +0000, Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote: > 1) i agree with Alexia , get rid of all duplicates as the "circle soft" and "circle hard" brush. > If may be scaled only 1 is needed Yes. For script compatibility, either ship them, or have the brush-choosing code automatically interpolate, if a script asks for "footprint-36" and we have only "footprint" or maybe "footprint-200". > 2) most flexible brushes are that created with the brush editor that can be not only resized but > tilted, rotated,made harder or softer on the fly, even with keystrokes Maybe there's a need for a structured brush name format? "footprint/titled 15-size 96.2/colours bg fg/spacing 150%/" > > But shapes are so limited : will be no possible add some simple shapes as spiral and ring ? Yes, with SVG brushes (I hope). > 3 about animated brush, stars, grass,stones and dirty brushes may be a good example, > their possible use should be intuitive Careful! "intuitive" is a word people use to mean, "based on my experience, I could predict how to use it" but people have very varied backgrounds. We should leave "intuitive" for the Earl Peter Sikking, Duke of the Vision. > As default for clone tool i see a HARD circle brush at 100% opacity, That's the default brush for everything I think. PhotoShop displays a brush chooser with a slider for scale, iirc, and you can even put it on the toolbar, as you can with paintshop pro and krita. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
