On 07/18/2009 06:53 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 15:02 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >> This is what we ended up in the last discussion. Anyone have some final >> comments or objections before I push this to master and port plug-ins to >> use this? > > I wonder how much sense it makes to actually create a duplicate image. > Most export plug-ins will want to save what's visible. So it would be > better if we would use this chance to get away from the > copy-image-on-export semantics and let file plug-ins save the projection > instead. About a year ago I tried to change gimp-export-image so that it > does not create a duplicate, but that wasn't possible w/o breaking > backwards compatibility. Now would be a very good chance to get this > done right. > I did considerer the possibility of using the projection directly with the API you added a while back, but I decided to go the safe and easy-to-port path instead. I don't think it is worth the effort to rewrite a lot of code that is likely to go obsolete with GEGL later anyway. / Martin _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
