Hi, On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 18:52 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Just a few updates on this. There will be no need for complex IPC > communications between the plug-ins and the core with regards to the UI, > the UI will simply live in the process of the plug-in, and we will > extend libgimp with means to create this UI so that it gets a unified > look between different plug-ins. Also, we don't need to port all > plug-ins, only the frequently used ones. We need to be backwards > compatible anyway so no need in converting the obscure plug-ins to use > the new UI. Whenever we introduce new API that replaces old API, we deprecate the old API. And of course we will also port all our plug-ins to the new API, if only as guidance for plug-in authors. That is absolutely necessary, but it is also not a problem. So far we have always found a volunteer for such jobs. The hard part is getting the new API right. So what we need at this point is an API proposal. Is anyone working on this? Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
