Hi, Daniel Johannsen schrieb: > I only like to add, that in the layer group it is the alpha value of the > lowest layer in the group > which provides the masking effect for the grouped layers above. > (And not a layer in the middle or on top of the group.) hmm, special-casing the bottom layer seems a bit odd to me. I'd expect the layer group mask to be a property of the layer group and that all layers within that group have independent transparency of their own. Looking at your examples, i assume the photoshop behaviour is convenient because you usually start with a layer and subsequently turn that into a layer group. Assuming correctly? greetings, peter _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
