On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, ?yvind Kol?s wrote: > > I was not describing user interface anywhere in my mail, To be honest, I think I missed your message. If I have mischaracterized what you have said (and judging from what you say below, it looks like someone has), I crave pardon. Here's what I was disagreeing with: yahvuu: > > > Yet AFAIKS none of the examples has shown a requirement for > > > doing actual image processing in CMYK space (which is a > > > good thing, btw). To justify this, the message continues: yahvuu: > > > By this i mean anything which can't be done by processing > > > the "plates" as separate grayscale channels (see ?yvind > > > Kolas's post). It sounds to me like the latter sentence is referring to the UI, considering the content of the former sentence. > I was describing > underlying implementation mechanisms. GEGL stores pixels in buffers > that can store and on demand convert to and from RGB, YCbCr, CIE Lab > and Grayscale (dynamically extendable with other color models). > Allowing image processing operations to be implemented using the > models best fit for a particular operation. I certainly don't take issue with that. > At the moment I do not have interest in CMYK but the above outline is > in line with my ideas on how GEGL should evolve. At first blush, what you said seems about right. I'll read it more closely and give it more thought. -- | Andrew A. Gill To ensure continued quality of service, | | this e-mail is being monitored by the NSA | | <superluser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.needsfoodbadly.com> | -- _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
