Hi, On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:01 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: > No, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that. At least with GEGL disabled, > There's no performance difference I know of between 2.6 and 2.7. Ok, thanks. > In truth I haven't run 2.6 very much on my slow low-memory PIII laptop, > and 2.7 not at all yet. 2.6 has mostly seemed comparable in speed to > 2.4 -- both a bit slower, on that machine, than 2.2 was, a difference > I don't notice on faster desktop machines. That's not surprising. In particular the much higher quality of the zoomed-out image display in GIMP 2.4, compared to 2.2, costs a few CPU cycles. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
