Hi, On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:06 +0100, Claus Berghammer (Bugzilla) wrote: > I just can repeat myself, the old routines were "good enough" for most > cases/people, so I would like to see the option, to use it alongside > the new code. This could be easily (from a user's perspective ;-) > done, by a "HQ" checkmark in the scale window. If it is unchecked, > gimp uses the old and fast code. If checked, the new "better but > slower" code is used. Please read my other reply. Your interpretation of the numbers is just plain wrong. With the patch from the bug report, GIMP 2.6 is faster and provides better quality. Please get your facts straight first. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
