Hi, On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:30 AM, <gg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:20:00 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux > <nrobidoux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> A student of mine and I have put together a gimp plug-in which ENLARGES >> images using a method which is analogous to global cubic splines, that >> is, which gives results analogous to lanczos. > > > Hi, > > in what way do you mean the results are analogous to lancsoz? > > Could you perhaps compare results of your plugin with the comparitive > results on the kingfisher head shot? > > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133-9.html > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133Z8g.png > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133C8g.png > and/or the pixel graphic: > > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133-8.html > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133Z8g.png > http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133C8g.png > > these two images scaled to 133% seemed to be the best cases in that test 133.33% please. If you use just 133.00%, the result will be the wrong dimensions and so, uncomparable. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
