gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I agree there's not much point in having a complex script like 630 lines > of proprietary code and reporting it as a GIMP bug. If there is an leakage > issue here , that this rather extencive use is bringing to light, it > certainly ought to be fixed but a simple test case that can be published > is needed. I plan to add a loop to invoke the script multiple times. When I am able to reproduce the problem I will look at converting the script to Script-Fu. By converting it to Script-Fu, which has had a lot of recent attention, it should help determine whether the problem is in GIMP or the gimp-perl binding. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?" Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"Same thing we always do, Pinkutus: | Try to assimilate the world!" #include <disclaimer/favourite> | -Pinkutus & the Borg _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
