On Sun March 23 2008 19:39:42 Sven Neumann wrote:
> I might be totally wrong on this, but as far as I know GTK+ applications
> use the GTK+ input methods framework. The details of SCIM should be
> hidden behind that abstraction. We should definitely continue to do
> this, on the canvas, as in our text entries. One one of the main goals
> of this project is to allow text input on the canvas without
> compromising the ability to use the GTK+ input methods.
>
Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Frankly, I don't know clearly
about how GTK+ work. I'm sorry I assumed that as a matter of course.
As a student interested in image processing, I hope I could program for gimp,
and GSoC is a chance for me. In order to avoid to be unrealistic, I read the
Ideas list on the wiki, and tried to find which project fit for me. In view
of my native language, I chose On-canvans text editing at first. But it seems
the compatibility of input method is not a problem, so I think On-canvas text
editing is not the most fit project for me.
Another project I was interested in is about the UFRaw plug-in. The web site
ufraw.sourceforge.net said there are three important features which are still
missing in UFRaw : 100% Zooming, Sharpening, and Embed EXIF data. Although I
have little experience of developing a GUI program, I'm self-confidence with
my knowledge about signal(Esp. 2-D image) processing theory. I wish to work
for 100% Zooming or Sharpening, because I think image processing theory is
needed in those projects.
Best wishes,
Zhang Junbo
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
