On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But what you currently have seems to be very far from the spec [1]. > Is this intentional or have you just not been able to steer your > current work into the direction of the spec? Just asking since it > would be sad if someone worked hard on something that isn't going > to be used anyway :/ The spec is currently underspecified. It says a great deal about what should *not* go into the window, but almost nothing about what *should*, with the exception of an idea that Peter has dropped (a slider). Well, _something_ has to go there. I have been trying to incorporate the results of the discussion that followed the specification. As usual, the results were somewhat ambiguous, so I have had to make decisions which might be wrong. Mostly I thought that it was necessary to show something concrete, to keep the topic from fading. Second, please don't worry too much about how hard I am working. I have tried a hundred variations by now, and am happy to try a hundred more. And even if none of this ends up being used, I have learned a tremendous amount in the process. -- Bill _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
