Re: discussing the roadmap for 2.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A change in file formats should be postponed until a bump in the major  
version number takes place (per GNU coding standards?). But my  
proposal of adding parasites containing layer group meta-data to files  
saved in the current XCF standard is indeed merely an interim  
solution, permitting time for a new format to be decided upon (not an  
insignificant task in itself).

Quoting Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On 10/26/07, saulgoode wrote:
>
>> Finally, there should be an effort to maintain integrity of the XCF
>> file format by converting between the core implementation of layer
>> groups and parasites attached to drawables during saves and loads of
>> XCF files (older GIMP versions would read the files but lose the layer
>> grouping information).
>
> IIRC, it was planned to nuke current XCF at some stage of development
> in favour of an XML based file format (XCF2, OpenRaster, whatever).


_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux