Le 07-09-27 à 02:59, Sven Neumann a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:25 -0400, Yves de Champlain wrote: > >> Sorry if I'm asking a stupid question ... >> >> Is it possible to compile gimp with dbus support without having to >> use dbus-lauch to launch it ? > > d-bus support only makes sense if you are on a desktop that already > runs > a session bus. The GNOME desktop environment for example provides > this. > So if that is not the case for you, then you should probably compile > without d-bus support. > > We might not have tested this good enough. Are there any problems > running an executable that is compiled with d-bus support on a desktop > without a session bus? My problem is, in fact, thatI don't really know dbus and how it works, but I maintain gimp for macports and I usually try to go with the app's default settings. Now, if I get it right, it should work if, for example, I am running gimp inside a dbus-launched gnome-session ? I do have a dbus-daemon running but it does not seem sufficient. I get yves$ gimp-2.4 process 16616: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/local/var/lib/dbus/machine- id": No such file or directory So I replaced the gimp symlink with a little script that just does "dbus-launch gimp-2.4" but I am considering to make dbus an option rather than a default in macports. Do you have an opinion about this ? Thanks yves _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
