Hi, On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:27 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: > You're absolutely right. This discussion is pointless. If you suggest > that a script for scaling down in several steps is a valid solution you > know as much about image manipulation as I do about coding. So don't > waste each other's time. > I'd be happy if you choose to listen to the users, even if they can't > make a patch. But since the first time I was here, I see the same: every > suggestion a user makes, you almost call him stupid. First of all, I didn't call you or anyone else stupid. Second, this is a developer list. If you want to make a user suggestion without going into implementation details, then please use the gimp-user mailing-list for that. The point you raised is handled in our bug-tracker and it was high on the priority list for 2.4. Unfortunately it has not been resolved yet. As a member of the gimp-developer list, I expect you to know that. There is not much point in bringing it up again since that is not likely going to help. That's why I call this a pointless discussion for the developer list. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
