Re: jpeg quality factor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:42:29 +0200, gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:49:49 +0200,  > <saulgoode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > I fail to see how I have misused the term "default" in any of this> > explanation.[...]> When an image already has a value for jpeg_quality , or any other  > paramter, replacing this is not providing a default it is a forcing.
I hope that you both read the message in which I was suggesting touse the terms "default", "original" or "current" depending on wheresome values come from.  As I explained in that message, the"original" value (read from the file) will usually override any"default" value (coming from GIMP or from the plug-in).
However, some plug-ins do not even attempt to read the "original"value for some parameters because for some file formats it does notmake sense to re-use the same values as in the original file.
For JPEG quality, I think that it is best to do as in Tor's patch:if the "original" value is higher than the "default", then use that.Otherwise, use the "default" so that the user is not surprised tohave a file saved with a lower quality than expected.
-Raphaël_______________________________________________Gimp-developer mailing listGimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux