Re: Doing an action for each color in an indexed color-palette

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/5/07, Roberto Uhlig <Roberto.Uhlig@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello and best thanks first,
> but it doesn't work correct on my xp-pc with gimp GIMP 2.3.10.
> After private consultation with saul some testing and some changes for windows (backslash \) now it works fine.
> Essential change is, that saul's
> ;;         (set! blue  (fmod (aref color-map (+ 2 index)) 256))
> doesn't work.
> aref brings sometimes negative eg. -51 values. In that case you have to ad 256 to become the realy color-value for blue.
> So I implementet
>           (set! blue  (aref color-map (+ 2 index)))
>           (if (< blue 0) (set! blue (+ blue 256)))
> and it does his job.
> I've tested it only under WINXP with Gimp 2.3.10 and also with 2.2.11.
>
> Because of a bug in save-tiff-plugin in gimp 2.3.x (I din't know which was the fix) it isn't possible to save black-white (1bit) indexed with older gimp's.
> In my 2.3.10 it works fine.
>
> Where can I find Informations about internals of the color-map int8array data storage, because I found that negative integer values?

I don't know where you can find that info; but I know myself -- Each
image's colormap is made up of sets of 3 bytes (R,G,B); these values
are unsigned. Since you have found you had to add 256 to the values in
that case, it seems to me that script-fu must be wrongly treating the
colormap values as signed values, and this is a bug.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux