On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:35:03AM +0100, Claus Cyrny wrote: > Hi Sven, > > Sven Neumann wrote: > > [ ... ] > > I don't think however that the gfig plug-in has > > anything to do with this. > It does insofar, as it binds unnecessary develop- > er resources. I have been using the Gimp now for > several years, but I'm beginning to ask myself where > the priorities for the developers are. Wouldn't, say, > 16-/32-bit be more important than a small vector > graphics program that is so difficult to handle? > Of course there's no direct connection between > 'gfig' and the text tool; it's just a matter on how to > spend developer resources. You assumption that significant developer resources go into maintaining gfig is simply false. That's why everyone else is confused. -Yosh _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
