Sven Neumann wrote: > There are a few things that we probably should address: > > (1) We might need a way to override this behaviour. Under certain > circumstances it might be useful to have multiple instances of GIMP > running. A command-line option could be added to enforce this. I agree: from a translator point of view I would find useful the capability of launching two GIMP instances with different locales (from two terminals with a properly set LANG environment variable) > (2) What should happen if gimp is already runnning and gimp is launched > again but with no files or URIs on the command-line? IMO it would be > best if gimp exported a method to the bus that allows the toolbox to be > raised. Instead of launching a second instance, we could just raise the > first one then. Does that make sense? Yes. Would this behaviour cope also with an instance running in a workspace not currently displayed ? > (3) Should gimp-remote still be built and installed even if the d-bus > functionality is built into the gimp exectuable? The patch currently > doesn't change this, it just removes the reference to gimp-remote from > the gimp.desktop file. IMHO yes. -- Alessandro Falappa web: http://www.falappa.net/ _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
