On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:44:56 +0100 Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, I don't know why. All I can do is look at the header file and > documentation of littleCMS. What you are saying looks like there is a > bug in lcms. Either the code or the header file is wrong. Or we are > simply misinterpreting things. Perhaps it would be a good thing to bring > this up on the lcms mailing-list. If you do that, please add me to the > Cc. > > > Sven I think that there is a difference of recognition to "ProofingIntent" in between us and them. In "LCMSAPI.TXT", they are describing in the explanation of "cmsCreateProofingTransform" function as follows: > ProofingIntent: Is the intent for translating emulated colors. > Default is INTENT_ABSOLUTE_COLORIMETRIC. I guess that four words "into Output color space" are missing. # I forgot to explain the following in the last message. # They are the one having described it based on an actual function definition. # # [Input]->(Intent)->[PCS]->(Intent*1)->[Proofing]-> # ->(Rel. colorimetric)->[PCS]->(ProofingIntent)->[Output] # # *1 If Intent is Absolute colorimetric, it is replaced with Relative colorimetric. # # In the above chart, if ProofingProfile is NULL, the chart is changed as follows: # # [Input]->(Intent)->[PCS]->(Intent)->[Output] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Softproof-rendering-intent-tf2902147.html#a8129287 Sent from the Gimp Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
