Philip Ganchev wrote: > On 10/12/06, Jakub Steiner <jimmac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The two major use cases when this would be a more efficient interface is >> for us GIMPers who already know what functionality they want and don't >> need to go three levels deep, but also for novice users for who it will >> perhaps be easier to search for 'replace color' instead of browsing >> through the menu tree. If filters and functions have some additional >> metadata, providing for example name of the same functionality in >> competing graphic packages, things would become easier to discover for >> novices. > > I agree that the commands should be searchable by many terms. But I > think all terms should be part of the description, not be metadata. We should probably check how emacs does this - the M-x whatever-command is pretty close to this proposal, and there are ways to seach for specific commands as well. HTH, Michael -- GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org | _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer