Hi, On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:10 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > From my point of view, Tiny-Fu is now ready to replace Script-Fu and I > would like to encourage everybody to make the switch so that we can > fix any remaining bugs. Considering that Tiny-Fu solves some real > problems (i18n), the sooner we can do the switch, the better. First of all, I would like to hear Kevin on this. I have asked him to tell us about his goals for Tiny-Fu and in order to evaluate this question, we absolutely need to know what the goals are. Then, I would suggest that instead of ending maintainance of Script-Fu that we switch the Scheme interpreter in Script-Fu to tiny-scheme. Instead of removing our only platform independent language binding, we should apply the changes that Kevin has done in the gimp-tiny-fu module to the plug-ins/script-fu directory in the GIMP tree. This should be a relatively small change since it only involves replacing the Scheme interpreter. The scripts itself and probably most of the UI code can be left untouched. Development on Script-Fu can then continue as usual and hopefully under the lead of Kevin and the tiny-fu CVS module has fulfilled its role and can be declared as merged and closed. > Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow > that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be > possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu > explicitely, but otherwise Script-Fu should be considered as obsolete. Definitely not. Not unless we have discussed this. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
