Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:03 -0400, Kevin Sookocheff wrote: > That's because right now the Laplacian solver isn't optimized. If we > used another algorithm, or optimized the current one it would be fine. > The tool isn't "real-time" at the moment and clicking is the only way > to use it for the moment. I don't see how optimizing the algorithm would solve the usability problem. If we optimized the algorithm, we would spend less CPU cycles, but the tool would still not behave like a paint tool. I think we need to do something about the way the tool works. I have outlined a possible solution in another mail. Of course optimizing the Laplacion solver is still desirable. Have you done any profiling on this yet? Is there a way to benchmark it? A regression test would also be nice to have for this purpose. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
