Hi,
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 15:17 -0700, saulgoode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Also, the "*-parasite-find" PDB functions return a list containing a
> single list: for example,
>
> (("gimp-comment" 1 #18"4372656174656420776974682047494d5000"))
>
> There does not appear to be a way to create multiple parasites with
> the same name -- the "*-parasite-attach" function changes the value of
> the existing parasite. Is there a reason for the parasite to be
> enclosed doubly within a list?
That's not quite right. It returns a list if called by Script-Fu because
all PDB functions return a list when called through Script-Fu.
> Tattoos:
>
> If an object has a specific tattoo assigned to it then, when the
> object is destroyed, is the tattoo value made available for re-use?
> For example, I have three layers and record their tattoos. I then
> merge those layers which generates a new layer (with a new tattoo).
> Can I rely on the tattoos of the original layers not being assigned to
> a new object (during that image editing session)?
Being a unique identifer is the idea of tattoos.
Sven
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
