Re: Gimp connotations ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



À (At) 15h11 -0400 15/05/06, Fennec écrivait (wrote) :
Well... I don't think I've even seen an IBM product with a name as bad as The GIMP. I think a name change would be a good idea- it might be a little damaging in the short term, yes - just imagine all the fun that the various Linux distros would have, for instance - but would probably lead to a brighter future.

A name is only a name.

"What's in a name? A rose, by any other name, would smell as sweet." - W. Shakespeare

BTW and for all to read, FLOSS or FOSS or OSS is not a product is not a product is not a product.

GIMP is not a product. It's a project.

Period.

I acknowledge this is hard to understand for some people. Once they do, they just forget about unproductive discussion such as this one.

You must be joking.

Louis

You'd need a real initiative from the real Top Brass people to change the name, though, or it would never happen - until then, arguments about it are just so much hot air.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux