On 3/21/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >GIMP does not attempt to be Photoshop nor to be like Photoshop. > > Well, I think it should! If there is any software today that has potential > to be a PS counterpart, it is GIMP. I mean why, would we not want it to be > Photoshop? It's so simple that I fail to understand, why so many people can't figure it out: innovation is about making difference, not copying. You are doomed to fail if you try to make a great tool by carbon copying it. Alexandre _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
