On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:18:03AM +0000, "Alastair M. Robinson" <blackfive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >But still, its clearly a faulty algorithm... Quite serious as well(?)
>
> This might be a silly question, but why is GIMP using interpolation at
> all when reducing images?
>
> Shouldn't it be doing weighted averaging of all the source pixels that
> contribute to a destination pixel?
Weighted averaging is a way of interpolation.
Regarding the original image, though: at least imagemagick produces a
sharp image without any artifacts when using lanczos, so maybe there is a
problem.
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ pcg@xxxxxxxx
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
