On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:22:00 +0100, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > That said, I would like to state that whatever happens in GTK+, is of > course our responsibility as well. After all it's the GIMP toolkit. > IMO we should work a lot closer with the GTK+ development team. If it > was me, the GIMP development branch would depend on the latest CVS > versions of glib and gtk+. That would allow us to follow the > development a lot closer and would allow us to give feedback early > enough for it to be considered. The way we are working now (a lot of > developers still using the now unmaintained gtk+-2.4 branch), we are > of course always way too late. For a long time the policy was that we used the most recent devel branch release. When did that change? CVS HEAD is a little too fast-moving, but I don't have a problem with using the latest devel version, and I don't remember anyone else having a problem with it, either. Rockwalrus
