Sven Neumann (sven@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Robert L Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I keep master copies untouched and rely on applications to show the
> > implied rotation.
>
> You are aware that there's absolutely no good reason to do that?
> Rotation of JPEG images using exiftran or jpegtran is a lossless
> operation.
iff the width and height is a multiple of 8 or 16 pixels (which usually is
true for photos).
jpegtran keeps the data intact for non-8-multiples but then the visible
result is not exactly the expected rotation.
Bye,
Simon
--
simon@xxxxxxxx http://simon.budig.de/
