Re: [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: weskaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb
From: Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:51:49 +0100
Cc: gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: <200412290953.AA437649564@primate.ucdavis.edu> (William Skaggs's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:53:10 -0800")
List-archive: </lists/gimp-developer>
List-help: <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=help>
List-id: <gimp-developer.lists.xcf.berkeley.edu>
List-post: <mailto:gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer>, <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer>, <mailto:gimp-developer-request@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200412290953.AA437649564@primate.ucdavis.edu>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

"William Skaggs" <weskaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> At the same time I also added
>
> gimp_palette_is_editable()

Would you also add gimp_gradient_is_editable() while you're at it?

ciao,
--mitch

References:
- [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb
  - From: William Skaggs

Prev by Date: [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb
Next by Date: [Gimp-developer] size-pressure relationship has been inverted for airbrush: complaints sought
Previous by thread: [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb
Next by thread: [Gimp-developer] size-pressure relationship has been inverted for airbrush: complaints sought
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Video For Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [gtk] [GIMP for Windows] [KDE] [GEGL] [Gimp's Home] [Gimp on GUI] [Gimp on Windows] [Steve's Art]