Hi, "William Skaggs" <weskaggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've been thinking about three things that are highly desired but > have been waiting for the migration to gegl: support for 16 bits, > layer groups, and procedural layers. It seems to me that all of > them can be achieved in GIMP 2 without major infrastructure changes, > not perhaps in the most ideal way, but not in a kludgy way either. > Given that the switch to gegl will probably entail a long development > cycle, it may be worth considering what can be done in the meantime > with GIMP 2. > > In this email I will discuss the 16-bit-depth issue, and leave the > others for later. Let's see. We have GIMP 2.2 done and are preparing to switch to GEGL. At this point you are trying to propose a kludge? Sorry, but I am not going to read any further... Sven
